Music

You are currently browsing articles tagged Music.

Love the ‘plus’

I just wanted to alert all the music lovers out there about something that was announced by Apple recently with amazingly little fanfare:  all the music on the iTunes store is now encoded at the ‘iTunes Plus’ standard:  256kbps AAC, with no DRM.  If you already know what that means, feel free to skip to the last paragraph; if not, keep reading to see how this geekspeak is really important for your ears!

Digital music works by encoding the sound vibrations as streams of data.  In order to work well, this requires a lot of data — CD quality music has 44,100 chunks of 16 bits encoded into every second of sound.  In the days of antiquity (like, before 10 years ago) there was no practical way to move that many bits down the information superhighway.  Bump.

The funny thing is, some clever people figured out that we don’t actually hear everything that gets thrown at our ears.  The details get complicated, but the point is that there’s a whole lot going on in our ears and the connection between our ears and our brains that shape the sound that we perceive, and many parts of the sound become practically (or nearly) imperceptible.  So then some really clever people put two and two together and thought, ‘What if we made a computer program that could take out the sound we don’t hear?’  Less sound means less data.  And that was the birth of compression.

It goes without saying that compression only works as well as the computer is able to guess what we can (and can’t) hear.  As soon as it takes out something obvious, it’s no good.  After a few earlier attempts, the now-famous mp3 was the first to come close.

I mentioned that compression was designed for the internet, but it soon found another important use:  the portable player.  If I just copied my cds onto the ipod I own, I estimate it would be full after about 28 cds.  With compression on the other hand, I currently have 2643 tracks, or 8.5 days of continuous playback… and it’s only about 2/3 full.  So compression was crucial to the ipod revolution.

I mentioned that all this was important, and some people are probably wondering why.  Here’s the deal:  now that everybody and their pet goldfish has an ipod and is downloading music (legally, I’m sure…) it’s about time that people started paying some attention to audio quality.  Bad compression is like junk food for your ears, except it doesn’t even taste good.  Kind of like… wet cardboard sprinkled with sand. (Really.)  But if you ate sandy cardboard for breakfast every day of your life, you just might think it was normal. (It’s not.)  If you’re in the habit of listening to your mp3 collection all the time, you really need to sit down with the cd and listen to both, one after the other.  You might be in for a shock.

So now you know you need good compression, how do you get it?  First thing first:  mp3 sucks.  I mean it.  Maybe it was enough to make Napster the rage in 2000, but now it really needs to die.  If your ipod is full of mp3s that you made from your cds, go and delete them all, and start over.  This time your songs will be smaller and better.

If you use iTunes on windows or mac, your answer is AAC.  (If you’re a linux geek then you already know ogg vorbis!)  In iTunes, go to the Edit menu and click Preferences.  Halfway down the page you’ll see an ‘Import Settings’ button.  Use the AAC encoder at the ‘iTunes Plus’ setting.  From now on, everything you import will sound much, much better.

It’s always been easy to import cds at these high settings, so why am I excited?  Until recently, most of the material on the iTunes store was encoded at half the quality.  I bought one album and wished I could have returned it.  Not only that, but the files had rediculous encryption nonsense attached.  Not any more!  With the iTunes Plus encoding (256kbps), I doubt I could tell the difference from the cd, especially on normal (consumer) equipment.

What was my first iTunes Plus purchase?  An album, from these guys, ‘Congotronics”:

Kudos to Apple for removing DRM and selling 256k aac files.  Life is good.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,

The joys of csound

I’m just realising how much I missed working with csound.

What’s csound? And why should you care?

Csound is a text-based language for rendering sound.  “Eh?” What I mean is, it has various objects (called opcodes) representing things like oscillators, filters, noise generators, envelope generators, etc.  It lets you string them together to make DIY synthesizers.

Why is that so cool?  First of all, there’s the “lego” philosophy: it gives you the pieces without telling you what to do with them.  Second, it puts all the power of your computer into music-making— if it’s fast enough you can play it in real-time like a hardware synth, if not you can write it to a file to play back later.  Finally, it’s open source and free!

So why hasn’t it taken the music world be storm?  After all, it’s been around for a hell-of-a-long time.  Well, it’s only recently that it’s worked well in real-time, which is totally cooler than waiting for things to render.  However, the real reason is that with freedom comes complexity.  It sure is nice to sit down with a Korg or Alesis, twiddle a few knobs and instantly hear a rich, detailed sound.  Nobody wants to sit down and program that from scratch, do they?

It is time- and energy-consuming, and that can be detrimental to the creative process.  However, not everyone has wads of money to spend on pre-programmed synths.  And some people get a kick out of doing things from scratch and doing things that engineers would never consider for a mass-market product.  Csound is for those people.

I doubt that many people reading this are “those people.”  So why am I plugging it here?  Because I think that anyone who is the least bit interested in sound and noise (whether or not you think of yourself as a “musician”) should spend some time playing with it.  You may not write finished pieces of music; but just like any time you pick up an instrument you’ve never played, you may enjoy messing around.  If that sounds like fun to you, leave a comment and I’ll explore it further!

For now, I leave you with a short sample of a piece made in csound called “A great crossing.”  The full recording can be found here.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,

My resolution

I’m not always a very self-motivated person. I get powerfully interested in things, but lack the discipline to see them to completion.

That’s a preface to say that I’m disappointed that I haven’t written more music. Particularly, music that has a life beyond a degree portfolio and/or being listened to once (out of courtesy) by a handful of people. That’s not to say that I wish I was writing pop tunes for Billboard ‘artists’. It is to say that I’ve become completely dissatisfied with the idea of art as some kind of technical achievement of form; or even worse, the means of self-expression! I like what Tolstoy had to say (emphasis mine, apologies for the gender bias):

Every work of art causes the receiver to enter into a certain kind of relationship both with him who produced, or is producing, the art, and with all those who, simultaneously, previously, or subsequently, receive the same artistic impression. …

The activity of art is based on the fact that a man, receiving through his sense of hearing or sight another man’s expression of feeling, is capable of experiencing the emotion which moved the man who expressed it. … And it is upon this capacity of man to receive another man’s expression of feeling and experience those feelings himself, that the activity of art is based. …

To evoke in oneself a feeling one has once experienced, and having evoked it in oneself, then, by means of movements, lines, colors, sounds, or forms expressed in words, so to transmit that feeling that others may experience the same feeling – this is the activity of art. …

Art is not, as the metaphysicians say, the manifestation of some mysterious idea of beauty or God; it is not, as the aesthetical physiologists say, a game in which man lets off his excess of stored-up energy; it is not the expression of man’s emotions by external signs; it is not the production of pleasing objects; and, above all, it is not pleasure; but it is a means of union among men. …

There is one indubitable indication distinguishing real art from its counterfeit, namely, the infectiousness of art. If a man, without exercising effort and without altering his standpoint on reading, hearing, or seeing another man’s work, experiences a mental condition which unites him with that man and with other people who also partake of that work of art, then the object evoking that condition is a work of art. And however poetical, realistic, effectful, or interesting a work may be, it is not a work of art if it does not evoke that feeling (quite distinct from all other feelings) of joy and of spiritual union with another (the author) and with others (those who are also infected by it). … The chief peculiarity of this feeling is that the receiver of a true artistic impression is so united to the artist that he feels as if the work were his own and not someone else’s – as if what it expresses were just what he had long been wishing to express. A real work of art destroys, in the consciousness of the receiver, the separation between himself and the artist – not that alone, but also between himself and all whose minds receive this work of art. In this freeing of our personality from its separation and isolation, in this uniting of it with others, lies the chief characteristic and the great attractive force of art.

Now, I’m bothered by the narrow focus on “feeling” and “emotion.” I think I would like to expand it to include attitudes, states of mind, even vaguer things that I can’t put into words. But the point which I am trying to internalise is that art is communication — but no, even that is too shallow, it’s not merely the transmission of something — art is communion.

I’m sick of art that is the voice of an isolated individual shouting to an unresponsive world from a mountaintop. I’ve been guilty of that, especially because I’ve embraced some unusual ideas and methods. That doesn’t mean I’m going to abandon those things. It means that I want to rethink their role in a relational context of a community of listeners and co-creators.

What community of listeners, you may ask (politely)? And what music am I writing? I’ll share some thoughts and sounds with you next time. For now, this is my resolution: to pursue music, communication, relationships, and communion.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,